CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Apamea scoparia

species of insect

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 20, 2024
Entity authorityQ4779085 ↗
Source-derived summary

Apamea scoparia is a moth of the family Noctuidae first described by Kauri Mikkola, Tomas Mustelin and J. Donald Lafontaine in 2000. It is one of the most common and widespread North American Apamea, being distributed from Newfoundland and Labrador to Alaska and British Columbia, and south to California and Arizona.

References

"932343.00 – 9365 – Apamea scoparia – Mikkola, Mustelin & Lafontaine, 2000". North American Moth Photographers Group. Mississippi State University. Retrieved November 15, 2020.

"Species Details Apamea scoparia". University of Alberta Museums. E.H. Strickland Entomological Museum. Retrieved November 15, 2020.

Editorial summary

“Apamea scoparia” enters the record as species of insect. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Apamea, scoparia and species can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2000, 2020—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Apamea, scoparia and species.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Apamea scoparia” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Apamea, scoparia and species provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 20, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q4779085. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2000 and 2020.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Apamea scoparia”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Apamea scoparia primary sources, Apamea scoparia archive and Apamea research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Apamea scoparia”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Apamea scoparia” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.