CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Abrikosov vortex

vortex of supercurrent in a type-II superconductor theoretically predicted by Alexei Abrikosov in 1957

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ844575 ↗
Source-derived summary

In superconductivity, an Abrikosov vortex (also called quantum vortex or a fluxon) is a vortex of supercurrent in a type-II superconductor, used by Soviet physicist Alexei Abrikosov to explain magnetic behavior of type-II superconductors in 1957. Abrikosov vortices occur generically in the Ginzburg–Landau theory of superconductivity.

Overview

The solution is a combination of fluxon solution by Fritz London, combined with a concept of core of quantum vortex by Lars Onsager.

In the quantum vortex, supercurrent circulates around the normal (i.e. non-superconducting) core of the vortex. The core has a size

∼

ξ

{\displaystyle \sim \xi }

— the superconducting coherence length (parameter of a Ginzburg–Landau theory). The supercurrents decay on the distance about

λ

{\displaystyle \lambda }

(London penetration depth) from the core. Note that in type-II superconductors

λ

>

ξ

/

2

{\displaystyle \lambda >\xi /{\sqrt {2}}}

. The circulating supercurrents induce magnetic fields with the total flux equal to a single flux quantum

Φ

0

{\displaystyle \Phi _{0}}

. Therefore, an Abrikosov vortex is often called a fluxon.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Abrikosov vortex” as vortex of supercurrent in a type-II superconductor theoretically predicted by Alexei Abrikosov in 1957. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1957—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Abrikosov, vortex and supercurrent can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as vortex of supercurrent in a type-II superconductor theoretically predicted by Alexei Abrikosov in 1957. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q844575. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1957.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Abrikosov vortex”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Abrikosov vortex primary sources, Abrikosov vortex archive and Abrikosov research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Abrikosov vortex”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Abrikosov vortex” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.