Aberth method
root-finding algorithm made in 1967 to compute all roots of univariate polynomials

The Aberth method, or Aberth–Ehrlich method or Ehrlich–Aberth method, named after Oliver Aberth and Louis W. Ehrlich, is a root-finding algorithm developed in 1967 for simultaneous approximation of all the roots of a univariate polynomial.
This method converges cubically, an improvement over the Durand–Kerner method, another algorithm for approximating all roots at once, which converges quadratically. (However, both algorithms converge linearly at multiple zeros.)
This method is used in MPSolve, which is the reference software for approximating all roots of a polynomial to an arbitrary precision.
Description
Let
p
(
x
)
=
p
n
x
n
+
p
n
−
1
x
n
−
1
+
⋯
+
p
1
x
+
p
0
{\displaystyle p(x)=p_{n}x^{n}+p_{n-1}x^{n-1}+\cdots +p_{1}x+p_{0}}
be a univariate polynomial of degree
n
{\displaystyle n}
with real or complex coefficients. Then there exist complex numbers
z
1
∗
,
z
2
∗
,
…
,
z
n
∗
{\displaystyle z_{1}^{*},\,z_{2}^{*},\dots ,z_{n}^{*}}
, the roots of
p
(
x
)
{\displaystyle p(x)}
, that give the factorization:
p
(
x
)
=
p
n
⋅
(
x
−
z
1
∗
)
⋅
(
x
−
z
2
∗
)
⋯
(
x
−
z
n
∗
)
.
{\displaystyle p(x)=p_{n}\cdot (x-z_{1}^{*})\cdot (x-z_{2}^{*})\cdots (x-z_{n}^{*}).}
Although those numbers are unknown, upper and lower bounds for their absolute values are computable from the coefficients of the polynomial. Now one can pick
n
{\displaystyle n}
distinct numbers in the complex plane—randomly or evenly distributed—such that their absolute values are within the same bounds. (Also, if the zeros are symmetrical, the starting points must not be exactly symmetrical along the same axis, as this can prevent convergence.) A set of such numbers is called an initial approximation of the set of roots of
p
(
x
)
{\displaystyle p(x)}
. This approximation can be iteratively improved using the following procedure.
Let
z
1
,
…
,
z
n
∈
C
{\displaystyle z_{1},\dots ,z_{n}\in \mathbb {C} }
be the current approximations of the zeros of
p
(
x
)
{\displaystyle p(x)}
.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Aberth method” as root-finding algorithm made in 1967 to compute all roots of univariate polynomials. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as root-finding algorithm made in 1967 to compute all roots of univariate polynomials. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 6, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q4667181. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1967.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Aberth method”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Aberth method primary sources, Aberth method archive and Aberth research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Aberth method”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Aberth method” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.