CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Abel-beth-maachah

ancient city in the north of Israel

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 14, 2026
Entity authorityQ2911724 ↗
Source-derived summary

Tel Abel Beth Maacah (Hebrew: תל אבל בית מעכה; Arabic: تل آبل القامع, romanized: Tell Abil el-Qameḥ) is a large archaeological tell with a small upper northern section and a large lower southern one, connected by a saddle. It is located on the northern border of present-day Israel, about 2 kilometres (1.2 mi) south of the town of Metula and about 6.5 kilometres (4.0 mi) west of Tel Dan.

The survey and excavations conducted in recent years have shown that the site had been inhabited during the Bronze and Iron Ages, as well as the Achaemenid, Hellenistic, Byzantine, Early Islamic, Crusader, Mamluk and Ottoman periods. Since at least the early 13th century CE the mound was the location of the Arab village of Abil al-Qamh, depopulated in 1948. However, the lower mound was not occupied after the Iron Age I (late 11th/early 10th centuries BCE), when occupation seems to have concentrated on the upper mound.

The site was fortified with walls and a rampart during the Middle Bronze Age II. These fortifications were reused in the Late Bronze Age in the south of the mound, but were abandoned in Iron Age I. A silver hoard in a jug, dating to the end of the Late Bronze Age, is one of the earliest such hoards found in the country. The Iron Age I sequence is among the densest in this region and includes strata of cultic, domestic, and public character. Traces of metal-working were found in the latter. The Iron Age II is represented by a large stone wall within the upper mound, which may be part of a citadel. A well-built structure dating to the Persian-early Hellenistic period was built above this wall, and other Iron Age remains.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Abel-beth-maachah” is ancient city in the north of Israel. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Abel-beth-maachah, ancient and city, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA strong orientation record where physical form, institutional use and historical geography need to be read together. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1948—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Abel-beth-maachah, ancient and city is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “ancient city in the north of Israel” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Place names and jurisdictional language are key evidence: both can reveal earlier catalogue descriptions and overlooked record series. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2911724. VIAF identifies the subject as 316747234. Authority coordinates are 33.258, 35.581. 2 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1948.

Critical limits

Modern boundaries and familiar names can conceal earlier jurisdictions or structures that do not align with the present site. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Abel-beth-maachah”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Abel-beth-maachah primary sources, Abel-beth-maachah archive and Abel-beth-maachah research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Abel-beth-maachah”?
  2. Which authority defined the place, boundary or structure at the relevant date?
  3. What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Abel-beth-maachah” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.