AT Protocol
social networking protocol

The AT Protocol (Authenticated Transfer Protocol, pronounced "at protocol", commonly shortened to ATproto or "ATP") is a protocol and set of open standards for decentralized publishing and distribution of self-authenticating data within the social web. It serves as the technical foundation of the Bluesky social network, originally developed as a reference implementation for the protocol, as well as an ecosystem of interoperable social applications and services collectively referred to as the ATmosphere.
The AT Protocol aims to address perceived issues with earlier decentralized social networking protocols such as ActivityPub and Nostr; these include user experience, semantic interoperability, discoverability, network scalability, and portability of user data and social graphs. It employs a modular microservice architecture and a federated, server-agnostic user identity to enable seamless movement between network services, with the goal of providing an integrated online experience without dependence on any single privileged entity.
As of January 2026, the protocol's general architecture, user repository, and data synchronization specifications are in the process of standardization within the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Further specifications—including data schemas, identity systems, OAuth implementation, and private/limited visibility data—are under development by Bluesky Social PBC. The company has said it may seek to standardize additional specifications through the IETF in the future, depending on the outcome of current efforts.
Design
The AT Protocol is designed to facilitate the creation of federated identities, so that users can retain, manage, and customize one online identity across multiple platforms and services. Independent hosts and other network participants can access and serve any user content within the network by fetching content formatted as predefined data schemas from federated network-wide data streams. Bluesky Social describes the protocol as being "modeled after the open web".
Compared to other protocols for social networking such as ActivityPub, where implementations are typically designed as a monolithic server that hosts both user data and the application, it splits up these elements into smaller microservices, which can be used as needed.
“AT Protocol” enters the record as social networking protocol. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Protocol, social and networking can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“AT Protocol” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Protocol, social and networking provides the most credible route into that argument.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 6, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q114881892. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2026.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “AT Protocol”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow AT Protocol primary sources, AT Protocol archive and Protocol research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “AT Protocol”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “AT Protocol” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.