CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

AS New Club

Martinican association football club

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 23, 2025
Entity authorityQ4654475 ↗
Source-derived summary

New Club is a football club of Martinique, based in the village Petit-Bourg in the commune Rivière-Salée.

Founded in 1948, they play in Martinique's second division, the Martinique Promotion d'Honneur.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “AS New Club” as martinican association football club. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewMost valuable as an event-and-institution map that identifies actors, dates and record creators for deeper historical inquiry. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1948—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1948. The account is most persuasive where Club, Martinican and association can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the history & society register because the source frames it as martinican association football club. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 23, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q4654475. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1948.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “AS New Club”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow AS New Club primary sources, AS New Club archive and Club research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “AS New Club”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “AS New Club” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.