Aquaporin-5
protein-coding gene in the species Homo sapiens

Aquaporin-5 (AQP-5) is a protein that in humans is encoded by the AQP5 gene.
Aquaporin-5 (AQP-5) is a water channel protein. Aquaporins are a family of small integral membrane proteins related to the major intrinsic protein (MIP or AQP0). Aquaporin-5 plays a role in the generation of saliva, tears and pulmonary secretions. AQP0, AQP2, AQP5, and AQP6 are closely related and all map to 12q13.
AQP-5 features a homotetrameric structure embedded in the cell membrane with the center of each monomer acting as a water pore. Each monomer structure is a transmembrane protein which have an asparagine–proline–alanine (NPA) hydrophobic residue embedded in the membrane of the cell. The NPA residue plays a role in water and solute permeability across the membrane of the cell.
References
Further reading
External links
AQP5+protein,+human at the U.S. National Library of Medicine Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Human AQP5 genome location and AQP5 gene details page in the UCSC Genome Browser.
This article incorporates text from the United States National Library of Medicine, which is in the public domain.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Aquaporin-5” is protein-coding gene in the species Homo sapiens. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Aquaporin-5, protein-coding and gene, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “protein-coding gene in the species Homo sapiens” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 8, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q17831317. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.
- Current terminology
- Classification context
- Finding cited technical literature
Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Aquaporin-5”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Aquaporin-5 primary sources, Aquaporin-5 archive and Aquaporin-5 research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Aquaporin-5”?
- Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
- Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Aquaporin-5” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.