CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

AMA Scientific Achievement Award

award conferred by the American Medical Association

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 10, 2023
Entity authorityQ1590608 ↗
Source-derived summary

The AMA Scientific Achievement Award is awarded by American Medical Association. It may be given to either physicians or non-physician scientists who have contributed significantly to the field of medical science. The award itself consists of a gold medallion.

The recipients are chosen by the AMA's Board of Trustees, and Physician candidates must be AMA members.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “AMA Scientific Achievement Award” as award conferred by the American Medical Association. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Scientific, Achievement and Award.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current 56-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Scientific, Achievement and Award providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “AMA Scientific Achievement Award”, the useful work is to connect “award conferred by the American Medical Association” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 10, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q1590608. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “AMA Scientific Achievement Award”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow AMA Scientific Achievement Award primary sources, AMA Scientific Achievement Award archive and Scientific research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “AMA Scientific Achievement Award”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “AMA Scientific Achievement Award” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.