CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

WorkKeys

workplace skill assessment tests

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 17, 2026
Entity authorityQ8034537
Source-derived summary

ACT WorkKeys consists of three elements:

Job skill assessments, which are designed to measure foundational and personal skills as they apply to the workplace

Job analysis, which pinpoints or estimates skill benchmarks for specific job positions that individuals must meet through testing

Skill training, which helps individuals boost their scores

Skill assessments

ACT WorkKeys includes eight workplace skill assessments:

Three core assessments used to earn the National Career Readiness Certificate (NCRC):

WorkKeys Applied Math (formerly Applied Mathematics) – applying mathematical reasoning to work-related problems

WorkKeys Workplace Documents (formerly Reading for Information) – comprehending work-related reading materials such as memos, bulletins, policy manuals, and governmental regulations

WorkKeys Graphic Literacy (formerly Locating Information) – using information from sources such as diagrams, floor plans, tables, forms, graphs, and charts

Additional assessments available:

Applied Technology – understanding technical principles as they apply to the workplace

Business Writing – composing clear, well-developed messages relating to on-the-job situations

Fit – how interests and values correspond to a particular career

Talent – includes dependability, assertiveness, and emotional stability

Workplace Observation – paying attention to details in instructions and demonstrations

Job analysis

The job analysis component of ACT WorkKeys, known as Job Profiling, helps to set benchmarks that correspond with WorkKeys scores, giving the examinee a target score to hit in order to qualify for a job.

Employers use job profiling to determine which skills are required for a job, and the level of each skill needed to perform the job successfully. This helps employers determine the standards for how an applicant must score in a particular WorkKeys skill assessment in order to be qualified for the job.

In the job profiling process, ACT-licensed profilers visit with the client company or organization and determine background information on the job to be profiled and how specifically the job relates to the company. The profiler tours the company and collects materials – such as training manuals, annual reports, company newsletters – that define the company.

The profiler then compiles an initial list of the tasks most relevant to the job being profiled. Subject matter experts – those who know the job best through incumbency or supervising the job – refine the list and rate each task based on two factors: importance of the task to the job and relative time spent on it. The subject matter experts then decide what minimum level of each skill is required to perform the job successfully.

The examinee's score on an ACT WorkKeys test corresponds to their preparedness or the level of remedial training needed.

ACT WorkKeys also offers two job analysis products that can be used without the help of a job profiler.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “WorkKeys” as workplace skill assessment tests. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 440-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where WorkKeys, workplace and skill can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as workplace skill assessment tests. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 17, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q8034537. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “WorkKeys”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow WorkKeys primary sources, WorkKeys archive and WorkKeys research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “WorkKeys”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from WorkKeys” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.