CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

ACN-PCN method

index of the relative effect of an aircraft on a specific runway

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 17, 2025
Entity authorityQ408493
Source-derived summary

The Aircraft Classification Number (ACN) – Pavement Classification Number (PCN) method is a standardized international airport pavement rating system promulgated by the ICAO in 1981. The method has been the official ICAO pavement rating system for pavements intended for aircraft of apron (ramp) mass greater than 5700 kg from 1981 to 2020. The method is scheduled to be replaced by the ACR-PCR method by November 28, 2024.

For the safe and efficient use of pavements, the method has been designed to:

enable aircraft operators to determine the permissible operating weights for their aircraft;

assist aircraft manufacturers to ensure compatibility between airfield pavements and the aircraft under development;

permit airport authorities to report on the aircraft they can accept and allow them to use any evaluation procedure of their choice to ascertain the loading the pavements can accept.

The method relies on the plain comparison of two numbers:

The ACN, a number that expresses the relative effect on an airplane of a given weight on a pavement structure for a specified standard subgrade strength;

The PCN, a number (and series of letters) representing the pavement bearing strength (on the same scale as ACN) of a given pavement section (runway, taxiway, apron) for unrestricted operations.

Aircraft Classification Number (ACN)

The ACN calculation process is fully described in ICAO Doc 9157 Aerodrome Design Manual – Part 3 "Pavements" (2nd ed.).

The procedure to calculate the ACN is as such:

Design a theoretical pavement according to a defined criterion:

For flexible pavements, design the pavement for 10,000 load applications of the aircraft according to the CBR design procedure combined with Boussinesq's solution for deflection in the elastic half-space

For rigid pavements, design the pavement to reach a standard flexural stress of 2.75 MPa at the bottom of the cement concrete layer according to Westergaard theory

Calculate the single wheel load, inflated at 1.25 MPa, that would require the same pavement – this is the Derived Single Wheel Load (DSWL)

The ACN is defined as twice the DSWL, expressed in thousands of kilograms

The ACN are calculated for four standard subgrade strengths, for flexible and rigid pavements, thus leading to 8 different values.

ACNs depend on the landing gear geometry (number of wheels and wheel spacing), the landing gear load (that is dependent upon the aircraft weight and center of gravity) and the tire pressure.

Normally, the aftmost center of gravity for the Maximum Ramp Weight (MRW) lead to the critical ACN.

Aircraft manufacturers publish the ACNs of their aircraft in their respective Aircraft Characteristics manuals.

The ICAO Aerodrome Design Manual contains the source code of computer programs for the calculation of ACNs.

Editorial summary

“ACN-PCN method” enters the record as index of the relative effect of an aircraft on a specific runway. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what ACN-PCN, method and index can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1981, 2020, 2024—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around ACN-PCN, method and index.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“ACN-PCN method” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, ACN-PCN, method and index provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 17, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q408493. The first chronological checks are 1981, 2020 and 2024.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “ACN-PCN method”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow ACN-PCN method primary sources, ACN-PCN method archive and ACN-PCN research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “ACN-PCN method”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from ACN-PCN method” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.