CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Asian American and Pacific Islander Policy Research Consortium

research organization focused on Asian American and Pacific Islander policy

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ16821971
Source-derived summary

The Asian American and Pacific Islander Policy Research Consortium (AAPIPRC) focuses on critical policy issues facing the Asian American and Pacific Islander communities. Conceived of as part of the White House Executive Order 13515 (2009) (Increasing Participation of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders in Federal Programs) the consortium supports, promotes, and conducts applied social science and policy research. In addition, Professor Paul M. Ong proposed two courses of action for AAPIPRC, one which formalizes working relationships among university-based AAPI research institutions and the other which would include publishing the proceedings of the briefs to inform policy.

Members

The consortium comprises four university-based research centers:

University of California, Los Angeles's Asian American Studies Center

University of Massachusetts, Boston's Institute for Asian American Studies

City University of New York's Asian American/Asian Research Institute

University of California's Asian American and Pacific Islanders Policy Multi-campus Research Program.

Conferences and advocacy work

Since its creation, AAPIPRC has sponsored annual conferences focused on connecting national, state and local agencies to AAPI policy and research. Hosted by the National Education Association in Washington D.C., the 2012 conference focused on "Expanding the Asian American and Pacific Islander Voice in National Policy." The 2013 conference focused on the use of survey and other research methodology to inform AAPI policy.

In addition to the conferences, AAPIPRC issued press releases to the Pew Research Center and Governing Board of the Pew Research Center in response Pew Research Center's report "The Rise of Asian Americans" and sensationalist headlines of the report that caused concerns among the AAPI academic community due to its misrepresentations of AAPI success.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Asian American and Pacific Islander Policy Research Consortium” is research organization focused on Asian American and Pacific Islander policy. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Asian, American and Pacific, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2009, 2012, 2013—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Asian, American and Pacific is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “research organization focused on Asian American and Pacific Islander policy” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q16821971. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2009, 2012 and 2013.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Asian American and Pacific Islander Policy Research Consortium”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Asian American and Pacific Islander Policy Research Consortium primary sources, Asian American and Pacific Islander Policy Research Consortium archive and Asian research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Asian American and Pacific Islander Policy Research Consortium”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Asian American and Pacific Islander Policy Research Consortium” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.