CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

A.S. Pueu

tahitian association football club

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 21, 2025
Entity authorityQ104865006 ↗
Source-derived summary

Association Sportive Pueu, formerly known as Association Sportive Taravao, is a football club from Taiarapu-Est, Tahiti. It currently competes in the Tahiti Ligue 1. They last compete on Ligue 1 in the season 2009/10.

Last seasons

Current squad

Squad for the 2020–21 Tahiti Ligue 1

Note: Flags indicate national team as defined under FIFA eligibility rules; some limited exceptions apply. Players may hold more than one non-FIFA nationality.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “A.S. Pueu” as tahitian association football club. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Pueu, tahitian and association.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2009, 2020—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Pueu, tahitian and association providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “A.S. Pueu”, the useful work is to connect “tahitian association football club” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 21, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q104865006. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2009 and 2020.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “A.S. Pueu”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow A.S. Pueu primary sources, A.S. Pueu archive and Pueu research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “A.S. Pueu”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “A.S. Pueu” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.