CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

A.S. Arue

Tahitian association football club

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 9, 2024
Entity authorityQ60785872 ↗
Source-derived summary

Association Sportive Arue, is a football club from Arue, Tahiti. It currently competes in the Tahiti Ligue 1, after being promoted from the Tahiti Ligue 2 in the 2019–20 season.

The club grounds are named after a previous mayor of Arue, Boris Léontieff, who was declared deceased after his plane went missing in May 2002.

Last seasons

Current squad

Squad for the 2020–21 Tahiti Ligue 1

Note: Flags indicate national team as defined under FIFA eligibility rules; some limited exceptions apply. Players may hold more than one non-FIFA nationality.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “A.S. Arue” as tahitian association football club. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Arue, Tahitian and association.

Editorial reviewMost valuable as an event-and-institution map that identifies actors, dates and record creators for deeper historical inquiry. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2019, 2002, 2020—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Arue, Tahitian and association providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “A.S. Arue”, the useful work is to connect “tahitian association football club” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 9, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q60785872. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2019, 2002 and 2020.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “A.S. Arue”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow A.S. Arue primary sources, A.S. Arue archive and Arue research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “A.S. Arue”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “A.S. Arue” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.