CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · Arts & Letters

2010 FAMAS Awards

2010 Filipino film award ceremony for achievements in film in 2009

Manuscripts, fine bindings, an engraving plate and preserved performance ephemera
Arts and lettersInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 3, 2026
Entity authorityQ4640911 ↗
Source-derived summary

The 58th Filipino Academy of Movie Arts and Sciences Awards Night was held on December 13, 2010 at GSIS Teatro, Diosdado Macapagal Boulevard, Pasay.

Dukot, by ATD Entertainment, is the recipient of this edition's FAMAS Award for Best Picture.

Awards

Major Awards

Winners are listed first and highlighted with boldface.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “2010 FAMAS Awards” as 2010 Filipino film award ceremony for achievements in film in 2009. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA useful identification and reception guide that helps separate the work itself from editions, performances, ownership and later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2010—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where FAMAS, Awards and Filipino can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the arts & letters register because the source frames it as 2010 Filipino film award ceremony for achievements in film in 2009. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Object files, edition statements, performance records and contemporary criticism preserve different stages of the work’s history. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4640911. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2010.

Critical limits

Rights, attribution and provenance may remain disputed even when a general reference summary presents a stable account. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.

Best used for
  • Identifying works and editions
  • Tracing reception history
  • Finding collection records
Verify next

The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2010 FAMAS Awards”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2010 FAMAS Awards primary sources, 2010 FAMAS Awards archive and FAMAS research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2010 FAMAS Awards”?
  2. Which edition, object, performance or recording is being described?
  3. Where is authorship, date or provenance documented?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2010 FAMAS Awards” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.