CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Arts & Letters

37th Robert Awards

2020 Danish film awards ceremony

Manuscripts, fine bindings, an engraving plate and preserved performance ephemera
Arts and lettersInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 11, 2026
Entity authorityQ122888296
Source-derived summary

The 37th Robert Awards ceremony, presented by Danish Film Academy, took place on 26 January 2020 virtually to honour the best in Danish film and television of 2019.

Winners and nominees

The nominations were announced on 6 January 2021. Winners are listed first, highlighted in boldface, and indicated with a double dagger (‡).

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “37th Robert Awards” is 2020 Danish film awards ceremony. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through 37th, Robert and Awards, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA productive route into publication, performance and collection histories when the underlying object or edition remains clearly identified. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2020, 2019, 2021—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, 37th, Robert and Awards is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “2020 Danish film awards ceremony” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Object files, edition statements, performance records and contemporary criticism preserve different stages of the work’s history. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 11, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q122888296. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2020, 2019 and 2021.

Critical limits

Rights, attribution and provenance may remain disputed even when a general reference summary presents a stable account. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.

Best used for
  • Identifying works and editions
  • Tracing reception history
  • Finding collection records
Verify next

The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “37th Robert Awards”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 37th Robert Awards primary sources, 37th Robert Awards archive and 37th research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “37th Robert Awards”?
  2. Where is authorship, date or provenance documented?
  3. Which edition, object, performance or recording is being described?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from 37th Robert Awards” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.