CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

2,6-Diaminopurine

chemical compound

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 11, 2026
Entity authorityQ4596802 ↗
Source-derived summary

2,6-diaminopurine (2,6-DAP, also known as 2-aminoadenine, standard IUPAC symbol n2A) is a compound once used in the treatment of leukemia. It is found instead of adenine (A) in the genetic material of some bacteriophage viruses,

In August 2011, a report, based on NASA studies with meteorites found on Earth, was published suggesting 2,6-diaminopurine and related organic molecules, including the DNA and RNA components adenine and guanine, may have been formed extraterrestrially in outer space.

Abbreviations

In virology it is referred to as the "Z" base. However, "Z" refers instead to 6-amino-5-nitropyridin-2-one in the Artificially Expanded Genetic Information System (AEGIS), so context is required to differentiate. AEGIS refers to this base as "AminoA" instead.

It has also been called the "D" base, but the more common interpretation of "D" is dihydrouridine.

In viruses

In cyanophage S-2L (Siphoviridae), diaminopurine is used instead of adenine (host evasion). Diaminopurine base (Z) pairs perfectly with thymine (T) as it is identical to adenine (A) but has an amine group at position 2 forming 3 intermolecular hydrogen bonds, eliminating the major difference between the two types of basepairs (weak:A-T and strong:C-G). This improved stability affects protein-binding interactions that rely on those differences.

Four papers published April 2021 further describes the use and production of the Z-base.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “2,6-Diaminopurine” as chemical compound. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around 6-Diaminopurine, chemical and compound.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2011, 2021—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with 6-Diaminopurine, chemical and compound providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “2,6-Diaminopurine”, the useful work is to connect “chemical compound” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 11, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4596802. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2011 and 2021.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2,6-Diaminopurine”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2,6-Diaminopurine primary sources, 2,6-Diaminopurine archive and 6-Diaminopurine research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2,6-Diaminopurine”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2,6-Diaminopurine” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.