1836 Newfoundland general election
Election in Canada
The 1836 Newfoundland general election was held from October 24 to November 15, 1836 in the Colony of Newfoundland. The Liberal reformers secured control of the government and defeated the governing Conservative party. However, the results of the election were later set aside by Chief Justice Henry John Boulton after he discovered some of the writs from the election had not been marked with the official seal. Some felt that this was a pretext used to justify holding another election because Liberal reformers had dominated the assembly.
Results
Results by district
† indicates that the incumbent did not run again.
‡ indicates that the incumbent ran in a different district.
$ indicates that the incumbent initially ran for re-election, but they later chose to withdraw
St. John's
Avalon Peninsula
Eastern and Southern Newfoundland
Notes
References
Further reading
Riggs, Bert (1981). "General Election #2A: November 1836". Encyclopedia of Newfoundland and Labrador, volume 1.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “1836 Newfoundland general election” is election in Canada. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Newfoundland, general and election, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “election in Canada” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 28, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7017953. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1836 and 1981.
Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.
- Event chronology
- Institutional context
- Locating named record creators
Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “1836 Newfoundland general election”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow 1836 Newfoundland general election primary sources, 1836 Newfoundland general election archive and Newfoundland research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “1836 Newfoundland general election”?
- What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
- Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “1836 Newfoundland general election” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.