2C-Ph
Chemical compound

2C-Ph, or 2C-Phenyl, also known as 2C-BI-1 or as 2,5-dimethoxy-4-phenylphenethylamine, is a serotonin receptor modulator of the phenethylamine and 2C families that was developed by Daniel Trachsel and David E. Nichols and colleagues.
The drug's affinity (Ki) for the rat serotonin 5-HT2A receptor was 778 nM. It was said to be an antagonist of this receptor. In a subsequent study, 2C-Ph was a weak partial agonist of the human serotonin 5-HT2A receptor (Ki = 630 nM, EC50Tooltip half-maximal effective concentration = 1,596 nM, EmaxTooltip maximal efficacy = 23%). The drug also shows affinity for the serotonin 5-HT1A, 5-HT2B, and 5-HT2C receptors, but did not activate the serotonin 5-HT2B receptor. In addition, it interacted with other monoamine receptors, with the monoamine transporters, and was a potent and high-efficacy partial agonist of the human trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) (EC50 = 580 nM, Emax = 82%).
Besides 2C-Ph itself, a variety of derivatives of 2C-Ph with substituents on the 4-position phenyl ring have been synthesized and studied by Trachsel and colleagues. These drugs, inclusive of 2C-Ph, have been denoted 2C-BI-1 to 2C-BI-12. 2C-BI-4 (the 2′-trifluoromethyl derivative), 2C-BI-8 (the 4′-methoxy derivative), and 2C-BI-12 (the 3′,4′-dimethoxy derivative) are agonists of the human serotonin 5-HT2A receptor with higher efficacy than 2C-Ph (EC50 = 37–2,408 nM, Emax = 38–44%). The effects of 2C-Ph and its derivatives in humans are unknown. However, 2C-BI-8 and 2C-BI-12 might have the potential for psychedelic effects.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “2C-Ph” is chemical compound. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through 2C-Ph, Chemical and compound, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “chemical compound” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 25, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q123490831. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.
- Current terminology
- Classification context
- Finding cited technical literature
Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “2C-Ph”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow 2C-Ph primary sources, 2C-Ph archive and 2C-Ph research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2C-Ph”?
- Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
- Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “2C-Ph” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.