208996 Achlys
trans-Neptunian object
208996 Achlys (provisional designation 2003 AZ84) is a large trans-Neptunian object orbiting the Sun in the Kuiper belt, a region of icy bodies beyond Neptune. It was discovered on 13 January 2003 by Chad Trujillo and Michael E. Brown at Palomar Observatory. Achlys has an elongated shape that is believed to be distorted by its rapid 6.8-hour rotation. Its diameter is estimated to be roughly 940 km (580 mi) across its equator to 490 km (300 mi) across its poles. After Pluto and Orcus, Achlys is the third largest member of the plutinos—a population of Kuiper belt objects following a 2:3 orbital resonance with Neptune, in which they complete two orbits for every three orbits completed by Neptune.
The surface of Achlys is dark gray and mostly composed of water ice. Observations of stellar occultations show that Achlys's surface bears a chasm or depression between 8 and 13 km (5.0 and 8.1 mi) deep, similar to those seen on Pluto and its moon Charon. Achlys has one known moon that is about 80 km (50 mi) in diameter. The mass and density of Achlys has not been measured, though predictions based on its shape and rotation suggest that it has a density lower than that of water ice.
History
Discovery
Achlys was discovered on 13 January 2003 by astronomers Chad Trujillo and Michael Brown at Palomar Observatory in San Diego County, California.
The public source identifies “208996 Achlys” as trans-Neptunian object. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Achlys, trans-Neptunian and object.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “208996 Achlys”, the useful work is to connect “trans-Neptunian object” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 6, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1944557. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2003.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “208996 Achlys”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow 208996 Achlys primary sources, 208996 Achlys archive and Achlys research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “208996 Achlys”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “208996 Achlys” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.