CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

2025 Shap derailment

derailment in Shap Rural, Westmorland and Furness, Cumbria, England

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 1, 2026
Entity authorityQ136698026 ↗
Source-derived summary

The 2025 Shap derailment occurred on 3 November 2025 when a passenger train operated by Avanti West Coast ran into a landslide obstructing the West Coast Main Line at Shap Rural, Cumbria, England. Four minor injuries were reported.

Incident

At 06:10 (GMT) on 3 November 2025, an Avanti West Coast passenger train was derailed approximately 1 mile (1,500 m) south of Shap Summit on the West Coast Main Line (WCML) in Cumbria. The service involved was the 04:28 Glasgow Central to London Euston (service 1R22), operated by a British Rail Class 390 Pendolino (unit number 390117). The train was travelling at approximately 83 mph (134 km/h) when it struck the landslide and ran derailed for about 560 m (1,840 ft). Photographs show that both of the leading vehicle's bogies and the front bogie of the second vehicle had derailed. All 95 people on board (86 passengers and 9 crew) were evacuated and taken to the Shap Wells Hotel, walking along the track to reach the hotel. Four minor injuries were reported; some passengers were reported to have suffered from shock. All the passengers had been escorted off and taken to their onward destinations by 10:40.

An initial report published by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB) on 12 November stated "a drainage channel, which runs across the slope above the washed-out material, was unable to accommodate the volume of water which was present.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “2025 Shap derailment” is derailment in Shap Rural, Westmorland and Furness, Cumbria, England. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Shap, derailment and Rural, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2025—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Shap, derailment and Rural is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “derailment in Shap Rural, Westmorland and Furness, Cumbria, England” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q136698026. Authority coordinates are 54.485, -2.651. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2025.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2025 Shap derailment”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2025 Shap derailment primary sources, 2025 Shap derailment archive and Shap research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2025 Shap derailment”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2025 Shap derailment” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.