CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2025 Cali Open – Doubles

2025 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 10, 2026
Entity authorityQ136448479 ↗
Source-derived summary

Juan Carlos Aguilar and Conner Huertas del Pino were the defending champions but chose not to defend their title.

Federico Agustín Gómez and Luis David Martínez won the title after defeating Guido Iván Justo and Franco Roncadelli 6–4, 6–4 in the final.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “2025 Cali Open – Doubles” as 2025 tennis event results. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Cali, Doubles and tennis.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current 42-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Cali, Doubles and tennis providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “2025 Cali Open – Doubles”, the useful work is to connect “2025 tennis event results” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 10, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q136448479. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2025 Cali Open – Doubles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2025 Cali Open – Doubles primary sources, 2025 Cali Open – Doubles archive and Cali research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2025 Cali Open – Doubles”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2025 Cali Open – Doubles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.