CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2024 Țiriac Open – Doubles

2024 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 11, 2025
Entity authorityQ125450874 ↗
Source-derived summary

Sadio Doumbia and Fabien Reboul defeated Harri Heliövaara and Henry Patten in the final, 6–3, 7–5 to win the doubles tennis title at the 2024 Țiriac Open.

Florin Mergea and Horia Tecău were the reigning champions from when the tournament was last held in 2016, but both players have since retired from professional tennis.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “2024 Țiriac Open – Doubles” as 2024 tennis event results. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2024, 2016—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Țiriac, Doubles and tennis can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the history & society register because the source frames it as 2024 tennis event results. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 11, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q125450874. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2024 and 2016.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2024 Țiriac Open – Doubles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2024 Țiriac Open – Doubles primary sources, 2024 Țiriac Open – Doubles archive and Țiriac research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2024 Țiriac Open – Doubles”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2024 Țiriac Open – Doubles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.