CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

2024 Credit One Charleston Open – Doubles

Doubles

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 29, 2024
Entity authorityQ125207784 ↗
Source-derived summary

Ashlyn Krueger and Sloane Stephens defeated Lyudmyla and Nadiia Kichenok in the final, 1–6, 6–3, [10–7] to win the doubles tennis title at the 2024 Charleston Open. It was both players' first WTA Tour doubles title, and they entered the tournament as wildcards.

Danielle Collins and Desirae Krawczyk were the reigning champions, but Collins chose not participate this year. Krawczyk partnered Caroline Dolehide, but lost in the first round to Eri Hozumi and Makoto Ninomiya.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “2024 Credit One Charleston Open – Doubles” is doubles. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Credit, Charleston and Doubles, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2024—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Credit, Charleston and Doubles is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “doubles” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 29, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q125207784. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2024.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2024 Credit One Charleston Open – Doubles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2024 Credit One Charleston Open – Doubles primary sources, 2024 Credit One Charleston Open – Doubles archive and Credit research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2024 Credit One Charleston Open – Doubles”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2024 Credit One Charleston Open – Doubles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.