CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2024 Bonn Open – Doubles

2024 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 21, 2025
Entity authorityQ128600775 ↗
Source-derived summary

This was the first edition of the tournament.

Théo Arribagé and Orlando Luz won the title after defeating Jeevan Nedunchezhiyan and Vijay Sundar Prashanth 6–2, 6–4 in the final.

Editorial summary

“2024 Bonn Open – Doubles” enters the record as 2024 tennis event results. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Bonn, Doubles and tennis can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewMost valuable as an event-and-institution map that identifies actors, dates and record creators for deeper historical inquiry. The current 29-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Bonn, Doubles and tennis.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“2024 Bonn Open – Doubles” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Bonn, Doubles and tennis provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 21, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q128600775.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2024 Bonn Open – Doubles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2024 Bonn Open – Doubles primary sources, 2024 Bonn Open – Doubles archive and Bonn research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2024 Bonn Open – Doubles”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2024 Bonn Open – Doubles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.