CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2023 Rolex Paris Masters – Doubles

2023 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 29, 2026
Entity authorityQ123223983 ↗
Source-derived summary

Santiago González and Édouard Roger-Vasselin defeated Rohan Bopanna and Matthew Ebden in the final, 6–2, 5–7, [10–7] to win the doubles tennis title at the 2023 Paris Masters.

Wesley Koolhof and Neal Skupski were the defending champions, but lost in the quarterfinals to González and Roger-Vasselin.

Austin Krajicek and Skupski were in contention for the ATP No. 1 doubles ranking. Krajicek retained the top ranking by winning his first match.

Seeds

All seeds received a bye into the second round.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “2023 Rolex Paris Masters – Doubles” is 2023 tennis event results. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Rolex, Paris and Masters, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2023—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Rolex, Paris and Masters is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “2023 tennis event results” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 29, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q123223983. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2023.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2023 Rolex Paris Masters – Doubles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2023 Rolex Paris Masters – Doubles primary sources, 2023 Rolex Paris Masters – Doubles archive and Rolex research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2023 Rolex Paris Masters – Doubles”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2023 Rolex Paris Masters – Doubles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.