CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2023 Jiangxi Open – Singles

tennis tournament event

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 23, 2024
Entity authorityQ123033465 ↗
Source-derived summary

Kateřina Siniaková defeated Marie Bouzková in the final, 1–6, 7–6(7–5), 7–6(7–4) to win the singles tennis title at the 2023 Jiangxi Open. She saved three championship points en route to her fifth WTA Tour singles title.

Rebecca Peterson was the reigning champion from when the event was last held in 2019, but did not participate this year.

Editorial summary

“2023 Jiangxi Open – Singles” enters the record as tennis tournament event. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Jiangxi, Singles and tennis can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2023, 2019—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Jiangxi, Singles and tennis.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“2023 Jiangxi Open – Singles” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Jiangxi, Singles and tennis provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 23, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q123033465. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2023 and 2019.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2023 Jiangxi Open – Singles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2023 Jiangxi Open – Singles primary sources, 2023 Jiangxi Open – Singles archive and Jiangxi research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2023 Jiangxi Open – Singles”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2023 Jiangxi Open – Singles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.