CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2023 Croatia Open Umag – Doubles

2023 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 29, 2026
Entity authorityQ120801163 ↗
Source-derived summary

Blaž Rola and Nino Serdarušić defeated the defending champion Simone Bolelli and his partner Andrea Vavassori in the final, 4–6, 7–6(7–2), [15–13] to win the doubles tennis title at the 2023 Croatia Open Umag.

Bolelli and Fabio Fognini were the reigning champions, but Fognini chose not to defend the title.

Editorial summary

“2023 Croatia Open Umag – Doubles” enters the record as 2023 tennis event results. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Croatia, Umag and Doubles can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2023—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Croatia, Umag and Doubles.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“2023 Croatia Open Umag – Doubles” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Croatia, Umag and Doubles provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 29, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q120801163. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2023.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2023 Croatia Open Umag – Doubles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2023 Croatia Open Umag – Doubles primary sources, 2023 Croatia Open Umag – Doubles archive and Croatia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2023 Croatia Open Umag – Doubles”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2023 Croatia Open Umag – Doubles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.