CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2023 Astana Open – Singles

2023 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 29, 2025
Entity authorityQ122819159 ↗
Source-derived summary

Adrian Mannarino defeated Sebastian Korda in the final, 4–6, 6–3, 6–2 to win the singles tennis title at the 2023 Astana Open. Mannarino won his second ATP Tour title of the season. Korda was contending for his first ATP Tour hardcourt title, but suffered a fifth loss in a tour-level hardcourt final.

Novak Djokovic was the reigning champion, but chose not to compete this year.

Seeds

The top four seeds received a bye into the second round.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “2023 Astana Open – Singles” as 2023 tennis event results. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Astana, Singles and tennis.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2023—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Astana, Singles and tennis providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “2023 Astana Open – Singles”, the useful work is to connect “2023 tennis event results” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 29, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q122819159. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2023.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2023 Astana Open – Singles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2023 Astana Open – Singles primary sources, 2023 Astana Open – Singles archive and Astana research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2023 Astana Open – Singles”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2023 Astana Open – Singles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.