CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2022 Estoril Open – Singles

2022 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 21, 2024
Entity authorityQ111705189 ↗
Source-derived summary

Sebastián Báez defeated Frances Tiafoe in the final, 6–3, 6–2 to win the singles tennis title at the 2022 Estoril Open. It was his maiden ATP Tour title.

Albert Ramos Viñolas was the defending champion, but he lost in the semifinals to Báez.

Seeds

The top four seeds received a bye into the second round.

Editorial summary

“2022 Estoril Open – Singles” enters the record as 2022 tennis event results. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Estoril, Singles and tennis can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewMost valuable as an event-and-institution map that identifies actors, dates and record creators for deeper historical inquiry. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2022—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Estoril, Singles and tennis.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“2022 Estoril Open – Singles” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Estoril, Singles and tennis provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 21, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q111705189. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2022.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2022 Estoril Open – Singles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2022 Estoril Open – Singles primary sources, 2022 Estoril Open – Singles archive and Estoril research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2022 Estoril Open – Singles”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2022 Estoril Open – Singles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.