CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

2022 Columbus Challenger

tennis tournament

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 19, 2024
Entity authorityQ110653853 ↗
Source-derived summary

The 2022 Columbus Challenger was a professional tennis tournament played on indoor hard courts. It was the eleventh edition of the men's tournament which was part of the 2022 ATP Challenger Tour. It took place in Columbus, United States between January 24 and 30 2022.

Champions

Singles

Yoshihito Nishioka def. Dominic Stricker 6–2, 6–4.

Doubles

Tennys Sandgren / Mikael Torpegaard def. Luca Margaroli / Yasutaka Uchiyama 5–7, 6–4, [10–5].

Singles main draw entrants

Seeds

1 Rankings are as of January 17, 2022.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “2022 Columbus Challenger” as tennis tournament. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2022—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Columbus, Challenger and tennis can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as tennis tournament. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 19, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q110653853. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2022.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2022 Columbus Challenger”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2022 Columbus Challenger primary sources, 2022 Columbus Challenger archive and Columbus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2022 Columbus Challenger”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2022 Columbus Challenger” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.