CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2022 Challenger de Villa María – Singles

2022 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 17, 2026
Entity authorityQ114059240 ↗
Source-derived summary

This was the first edition of the tournament.

Nicolás Kicker won the title after defeating Mariano Navone 7–5, 6–3 in the final.

Editorial summary

“2022 Challenger de Villa María – Singles” enters the record as 2022 tennis event results. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Challenger, Villa and María can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewMost valuable as an event-and-institution map that identifies actors, dates and record creators for deeper historical inquiry. The current 22-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Challenger, Villa and María.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“2022 Challenger de Villa María – Singles” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Challenger, Villa and María provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 17, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q114059240. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2022 Challenger de Villa María – Singles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2022 Challenger de Villa María – Singles primary sources, 2022 Challenger de Villa María – Singles archive and Challenger research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2022 Challenger de Villa María – Singles”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2022 Challenger de Villa María – Singles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.