CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2022 Atlanta Open – Doubles

2022 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 29, 2026
Entity authorityQ113301229
Source-derived summary

Thanasi Kokkinakis and Nick Kyrgios defeated Jason Kubler and John Peers in the final, 7–6(7–4), 7–5 to win the doubles tennis title at the 2022 Atlanta Open.

Reilly Opelka and Jannik Sinner were the reigning champions, but did not participate this year.

Rajeev Ram would have taken over the ATP no. 1 doubles ranking from his regular partner Joe Salisbury by winning the title partnering Jack Sock, but lost to Kokkinakis and Kyrgios in the semifinals.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “2022 Atlanta Open – Doubles” as 2022 tennis event results. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Atlanta, Doubles and tennis.

Editorial reviewMost valuable as an event-and-institution map that identifies actors, dates and record creators for deeper historical inquiry. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2022—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Atlanta, Doubles and tennis providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “2022 Atlanta Open – Doubles”, the useful work is to connect “2022 tennis event results” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 29, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q113301229. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2022.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2022 Atlanta Open – Doubles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2022 Atlanta Open – Doubles primary sources, 2022 Atlanta Open – Doubles archive and Atlanta research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2022 Atlanta Open – Doubles”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from 2022 Atlanta Open – Doubles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.