CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2021 WTA Argentina Open – Doubles

2021 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 22, 2024
Entity authorityQ109393514 ↗
Source-derived summary

This was the first edition of the tournament since 1987.

Irina Bara and Ekaterine Gorgodze won the title, defeating María Lourdes Carlé and Despina Papamichail in the final, 5–7, 7–5, [10–4].

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “2021 WTA Argentina Open – Doubles” as 2021 tennis event results. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Argentina, Doubles and tennis.

Editorial reviewMost valuable as an event-and-institution map that identifies actors, dates and record creators for deeper historical inquiry. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1987—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Argentina, Doubles and tennis providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “2021 WTA Argentina Open – Doubles”, the useful work is to connect “2021 tennis event results” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 22, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q109393514. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1987.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2021 WTA Argentina Open – Doubles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2021 WTA Argentina Open – Doubles primary sources, 2021 WTA Argentina Open – Doubles archive and Argentina research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2021 WTA Argentina Open – Doubles”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2021 WTA Argentina Open – Doubles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.