CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2021 NÖ Open – Singles

2021 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 14, 2025
Entity authorityQ108497881 ↗
Source-derived summary

This was the first edition of the tournament.

Mats Moraing won the title after defeating Hugo Gaston 6–2, 6–1 in the final.

Editorial summary

“2021 NÖ Open – Singles” enters the record as 2021 tennis event results. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Singles, tennis and event can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current 22-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Singles, tennis and event.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“2021 NÖ Open – Singles” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Singles, tennis and event provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 14, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q108497881. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2021 NÖ Open – Singles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2021 NÖ Open – Singles primary sources, 2021 NÖ Open – Singles archive and Singles research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2021 NÖ Open – Singles”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2021 NÖ Open – Singles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.