CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2021 Chile Open – Singles

2021 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 23, 2026
Entity authorityQ105830738 ↗
Source-derived summary

Cristian Garín defeated Facundo Bagnis in the final, 6–4, 6–7(3–7), 7–5 to capture the men's singles tennis title at the 2021 Chile Open.

Thiago Seyboth Wild was the defending champion, but chose not to defend his title.

Seeds

The top four seeds received a bye into the second round.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “2021 Chile Open – Singles” is 2021 tennis event results. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Chile, Singles and tennis, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2021—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Chile, Singles and tennis is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “2021 tennis event results” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q105830738. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2021.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2021 Chile Open – Singles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2021 Chile Open – Singles primary sources, 2021 Chile Open – Singles archive and Chile research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2021 Chile Open – Singles”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2021 Chile Open – Singles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.