CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2021 BMW Open – Singles

tennis tournament event

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 25, 2025
Entity authorityQ106617340 ↗
Source-derived summary

Nikoloz Basilashvili defeated Jan-Lennard Struff in the final, 6–4, 7–6(7–5) to win the men's singles tennis title at the 2021 Bavarian International Tennis Championships. After not dropping a set en route to his victory, Basilashvili earned his second title of the season and his fifth career ATP Tour singles title overall. Struff was in contention to win his first title in his first tour-level final.

Cristian Garín was the defending champion from when the tournament was last held in 2019, but he competed at the simultaneous Estoril Open instead.

Seeds

The top four seeds received a bye into the second round.

Editorial summary

“2021 BMW Open – Singles” enters the record as tennis tournament event. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Singles, tennis and tournament can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewMost valuable as an event-and-institution map that identifies actors, dates and record creators for deeper historical inquiry. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2021, 2019—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Singles, tennis and tournament.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“2021 BMW Open – Singles” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Singles, tennis and tournament provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 25, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q106617340. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2021 and 2019.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2021 BMW Open – Singles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2021 BMW Open – Singles primary sources, 2021 BMW Open – Singles archive and Singles research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2021 BMW Open – Singles”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2021 BMW Open – Singles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.