CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2019 French Open – Wheelchair quad doubles

2019 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 7, 2026
Entity authorityQ64512784 ↗
Source-derived summary

Dylan Alcott and David Wagner defeated Ymanitu Silva and Koji Sugeno in the final, 6–3, 6–3 to win the inaugural quad doubles wheelchair tennis title at the 2019 French Open. It was the second step towards an eventual Grand Slam for Alcott.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “2019 French Open – Wheelchair quad doubles” as 2019 tennis event results. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around French, Wheelchair and quad.

Editorial reviewMost valuable as an event-and-institution map that identifies actors, dates and record creators for deeper historical inquiry. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2019—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with French, Wheelchair and quad providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “2019 French Open – Wheelchair quad doubles”, the useful work is to connect “2019 tennis event results” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 7, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q64512784. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2019.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2019 French Open – Wheelchair quad doubles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2019 French Open – Wheelchair quad doubles primary sources, 2019 French Open – Wheelchair quad doubles archive and French research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2019 French Open – Wheelchair quad doubles”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2019 French Open – Wheelchair quad doubles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.