CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

2019 Eschborn–Frankfurt

cycling race

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 19, 2026
Entity authorityQ57163987 ↗
Source-derived summary

The 2019 Eschborn–Frankfurt was a road cycling one-day race that took place on 1 May 2019 in Germany. It was the 57th edition of Eschborn–Frankfurt and the 22nd event of the 2019 UCI World Tour. It was won in the sprint by Pascal Ackermann.

Teams

In total, twenty-two teams start the race. Each team delivered seven riders.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “2019 Eschborn–Frankfurt” as cycling race. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Eschborn, Frankfurt and cycling.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2019—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Eschborn, Frankfurt and cycling providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “2019 Eschborn–Frankfurt”, the useful work is to connect “cycling race” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q57163987. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2019.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2019 Eschborn–Frankfurt”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2019 Eschborn–Frankfurt primary sources, 2019 Eschborn–Frankfurt archive and Eschborn research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2019 Eschborn–Frankfurt”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2019 Eschborn–Frankfurt” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.