CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2018 Hungarian Challenger Open – Doubles

2018 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 9, 2025
Entity authorityQ48532926 ↗
Source-derived summary

Dino Marcan and Tristan-Samuel Weissborn were the defending champions but chose not to defend their title.

Félix Auger-Aliassime and Nicola Kuhn won the title after defeating Marin and Tomislav Draganja 2–6, 6–2, [11–9] in the final.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “2018 Hungarian Challenger Open – Doubles” as 2018 tennis event results. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewMost valuable as an event-and-institution map that identifies actors, dates and record creators for deeper historical inquiry. The current 36-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Hungarian, Challenger and Doubles can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the history & society register because the source frames it as 2018 tennis event results. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 9, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q48532926. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2018 Hungarian Challenger Open – Doubles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2018 Hungarian Challenger Open – Doubles primary sources, 2018 Hungarian Challenger Open – Doubles archive and Hungarian research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2018 Hungarian Challenger Open – Doubles”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2018 Hungarian Challenger Open – Doubles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.