CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Money in the Bank (2017)

WWE pay-per-view event

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 1, 2026
Entity authorityQ30032944 ↗
Source-derived summary

The 2017 Money in the Bank was a professional wrestling pay-per-view (PPV) and livestreaming event produced by WWE, held exclusively for wrestlers from the promotion's main roster brand, SmackDown. It was the eighth annual Money in the Bank event and took place on June 18, 2017, at the Scottrade Center in St. Louis, Missouri. The event centered on the Money in the Bank ladder match, a multi-person ladder match where the wrestlers compete to retrieve a briefcase hanging above the ring which contains a contract for a guaranteed world championship match at any time within the next year.

Seven matches were contested at the event, including one on the Kickoff pre-show. For the first time since 2013, there were two Money in the Bank ladder matches on the main card, including the first-ever women's version, and it is now standard for the event to include both a men's and women's version of the match. In the main event, Baron Corbin won the men's ladder match, earning a contract for a WWE Championship match, while in the opening bout, the first-ever women's version was controversially won by Carmella for a SmackDown Women's Championship match contract. In another prominent match, Jinder Mahal defeated Randy Orton to retain the WWE Championship. The event was also notable for the return of Maria Kanellis, who had last performed in WWE in December 2009, and the WWE debut of her husband, Mike Kanellis.

This was the first Money in the Bank event held since the reintroduction of the brand extension in July 2016.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Money in the Bank (2017)” as wWE pay-per-view event. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2017, 2013, 2009, 2016—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Money, Bank and pay-per-view can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the history & society register because the source frames it as wWE pay-per-view event. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q30032944. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2017, 2013, 2009 and 2016.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Money in the Bank (2017)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Money in the Bank (2017) primary sources, Money in the Bank (2017) archive and Money research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Money in the Bank (2017)”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Money in the Bank (2017)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.