CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

2017 Hawaii Tennis Open – Doubles

tennis tournament - women's doubles

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 3, 2026
Entity authorityQ43471192 ↗
Source-derived summary

Eri Hozumi and Miyu Kato were the defending champions, but Kato chose not to participate this year. Hozumi played alongside Asia Muhammad, but lost in the final to sisters Hsieh Shu-ying and Hsieh Su-wei, 1–6, 6–7(3–7).

Seeds

The top two seeds received a bye into the quarterfinals.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “2017 Hawaii Tennis Open – Doubles” as tennis tournament - women's doubles. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Hawaii, Tennis and Doubles.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 47-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Hawaii, Tennis and Doubles providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “2017 Hawaii Tennis Open – Doubles”, the useful work is to connect “tennis tournament - women's doubles” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q43471192. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2017 Hawaii Tennis Open – Doubles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2017 Hawaii Tennis Open – Doubles primary sources, 2017 Hawaii Tennis Open – Doubles archive and Hawaii research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2017 Hawaii Tennis Open – Doubles”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2017 Hawaii Tennis Open – Doubles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.