CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2017 French Open – Mixed doubles

2017 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 28, 2026
Entity authorityQ25344047 ↗
Source-derived summary

Gabriela Dabrowski and Rohan Bopanna won the mixed doubles tennis title at the 2017 French Open, defeating Anna-Lena Grönefeld and Robert Farah in the final, 2–6, 6–2, [12–10]. They saved two championship points in the third-set tiebreak.

Martina Hingis and Leander Paes were the defending champions, but lost in the first round to Katarina Srebotnik and Raven Klaasen.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “2017 French Open – Mixed doubles” as 2017 tennis event results. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around French, Mixed and doubles.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2017—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with French, Mixed and doubles providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “2017 French Open – Mixed doubles”, the useful work is to connect “2017 tennis event results” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 28, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q25344047. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2017.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2017 French Open – Mixed doubles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2017 French Open – Mixed doubles primary sources, 2017 French Open – Mixed doubles archive and French research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2017 French Open – Mixed doubles”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2017 French Open – Mixed doubles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.