CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

2017 ABN AMRO World Tennis Tournament – Singles

Tennis tournament

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 27, 2026
Entity authorityQ28743399 ↗
Source-derived summary

Martin Kližan was the defending champion but lost in the quarterfinals to Tomáš Berdych.

Jo-Wilfried Tsonga won the title, defeating David Goffin in the final, 4–6, 6–4, 6–1.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “2017 ABN AMRO World Tennis Tournament – Singles” as tennis tournament. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around AMRO, World and Tennis.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 28-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with AMRO, World and Tennis providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “2017 ABN AMRO World Tennis Tournament – Singles”, the useful work is to connect “tennis tournament” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 27, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q28743399. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2017 ABN AMRO World Tennis Tournament – Singles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2017 ABN AMRO World Tennis Tournament – Singles primary sources, 2017 ABN AMRO World Tennis Tournament – Singles archive and AMRO research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2017 ABN AMRO World Tennis Tournament – Singles”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2017 ABN AMRO World Tennis Tournament – Singles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.