CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

2016–17 Associação Académica de Coimbra – O.A.F. season

season of football team

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 6, 2026
Entity authorityQ24910119 ↗
Source-derived summary

The 2016–17 season is Académica's first season in the LigaPro following their relegation from the Primeira Liga last season. This season they also participated in the Taça de Portugal and Taça da Liga.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “2016–17 Associação Académica de Coimbra – O.A.F. season” as season of football team. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Associação, Académica and Coimbra.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2016—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Associação, Académica and Coimbra providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “2016–17 Associação Académica de Coimbra – O.A.F. season”, the useful work is to connect “season of football team” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 6, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q24910119. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2016.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2016–17 Associação Académica de Coimbra – O.A.F. season”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2016–17 Associação Académica de Coimbra – O.A.F. season primary sources, 2016–17 Associação Académica de Coimbra – O.A.F. season archive and Associação research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2016–17 Associação Académica de Coimbra – O.A.F. season”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2016–17 Associação Académica de Coimbra – O.A.F. season” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.