CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

2016 Nana Trophy – Singles

tennis tournament in Tunisia

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 27, 2022
Entity authorityQ24908829 ↗
Source-derived summary

María Irigoyen was the defending champion, but chose to participate in Madrid instead.

Ons Jabeur won the title, defeating Romina Oprandi in the final, 1–6, 6–2, 6–2.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “2016 Nana Trophy – Singles” is tennis tournament in Tunisia. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Nana, Trophy and Singles, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 27-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Nana, Trophy and Singles is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “tennis tournament in Tunisia” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 27, 2022. The linked authority identifier is Q24908829. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2016 Nana Trophy – Singles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2016 Nana Trophy – Singles primary sources, 2016 Nana Trophy – Singles archive and Nana research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2016 Nana Trophy – Singles”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2016 Nana Trophy – Singles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.