2016 Marburg Open
tennis tournament
The 2016 Marburg Open was a professional tennis tournament played on clay courts. It was the seventh edition of the tournament which was part of the 2016 ATP Challenger Tour. It took place in Marburg, Germany between 27 June and 4 July 2016.
Singles main-draw entrants
Seeds
1 Rankings are as of June 20, 2016.
Other entrants
The following players received wildcards into the singles main draw:
Sebastian Fanselow
Jeremy Jahn
Julian Lenz
Manuel Peña López
The following player received entry as an alternate:
Andrea Arnaboldi
The following players received entry from the qualifying draw:
Germain Gigounon
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Sumit Nagal
Yannik Reuter
The following player received entry as a lucky loser:
Giovanni Lapentti
Doubles main-draw entrants
Seeds
1 Rankings as of June 20, 2016.
Other entrants
The following pairs received wildcards into the doubles main draw:
Jan Beusch / Tadej Turk
Julian Lenz / Andreas Mies
Ivan Sabanov / Matej Sabanov
The following pair received entry courtesy of a protected ranking into the doubles main draw:
Gero Kretschmer / Simon Stadler
Champions
Singles
Jan Šátral def. Marco Trungelliti, 6–2, 6–4
Doubles
James Cerretani / Philipp Oswald def.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “2016 Marburg Open” is tennis tournament. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Marburg, tennis and tournament, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “tennis tournament” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 31, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q24887962. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2016.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “2016 Marburg Open”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow 2016 Marburg Open primary sources, 2016 Marburg Open archive and Marburg research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2016 Marburg Open”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “2016 Marburg Open” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.