CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

2016 Clásica de Almería

cycling race

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 19, 2026
Entity authorityQ21869773 ↗
Source-derived summary

The 2016 Clásica de Almería was the 31st edition of the Clásica de Almería cycle race and was held on 14 February 2016. The race, originally intended to be 184 km (114 mi) but cut short due to strong winds, started in Almería and finished in Roquetas de Mar. The race was won by Leigh Howard.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “2016 Clásica de Almería” is cycling race. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Clásica, Almería and cycling, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2016—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Clásica, Almería and cycling is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “cycling race” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q21869773. The first chronological checks are 2016.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2016 Clásica de Almería”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2016 Clásica de Almería primary sources, 2016 Clásica de Almería archive and Clásica research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2016 Clásica de Almería”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2016 Clásica de Almería” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.