CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

2015 Nishinomiya by-election

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 4, 2025
Entity authorityQ24908047 ↗
Source-derived summary

The 2015 Nishinomiya by-election (兵庫県議会議員西宮市選挙区補欠選挙, Hyōgo Kengikai Giin Nishinomiya Senkyoku Hoketsu Senkyo; Hyōgo Prefectural Assembly Nishinomiya District By-Election) was a by-election held on 25 January 2015 to fill two vacancies in the seven-member Nishinomiya district of the Hyogo Prefectural Assembly.

Five candidates contested the two seats. Masakazu Yoshioka of the Liberal Democratic Party and Yugo Nakano of the then-recently formed Japan Innovation Party were elected, winning 29.4% and 24.6% of the vote respectively. Voter turnout was 21.3%, the second-lowest ever for a by-election for the assembly.

Background

The vacancies arose due to the resignations of Ryutaro Nonomura, who was caught in a scandal surrounding inappropriate expense claims, and Haruyo Omae, who had resigned to seek a seat in the House of representatives in the December 2014 national general election.

Candidates

Five candidates had nominated for the election by the deadline on 16 January 2015; none of whom had previously held a seat in the prefectural assembly. The candidates in order of their time of nomination were:

Results

Yoshioka and Nakano won the two vacancies by receiving the highest number of votes under the Single non-transferable voting system. Voter turnout was 21.3%, the second-lowest turnout for a by-election for the Hyogo assembly behind the 16.95% that voted at a 2000 by-election. During the campaign, Yoshioka relied upon his record of 8 years and 2 terms as a Nishinomiya city councilor, stating that a "battle-ready politician is necessary". On the other hand, Nakano broadened his support by focusing on reform including measures to help families with children, claiming that "cutting reform must come first, as we musn't pass the tab on to our children".

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “2015 Nishinomiya by-election” as open-knowledge reference entry. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2015, 2014, 2000—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Nishinomiya, by-election and Open-knowledge can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as open-knowledge reference entry. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 4, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q24908047. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2015, 2014 and 2000.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2015 Nishinomiya by-election”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2015 Nishinomiya by-election primary sources, 2015 Nishinomiya by-election archive and Nishinomiya research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2015 Nishinomiya by-election”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2015 Nishinomiya by-election” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.