CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

2015 Lafayette Leopards football team

American college football team season

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 22, 2026
Entity authorityQ19880259 ↗
Source-derived summary

The 2015 Lafayette Leopards football team represented Lafayette College as member of the Patriot League during the 2015 NCAA Division I FCS football season. Led by 16th-year head coach Frank Tavani, the Leopards compiled an overall record of 1–10 with a mark of 0–6 in conference play, placing last out of seven teams in the Patriot League. Lafayette played home games at Fisher Field in Easton, Pennsylvania.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “2015 Lafayette Leopards football team” is american college football team season. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Lafayette, Leopards and football, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2015—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Lafayette, Leopards and football is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “american college football team season” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q19880259. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2015.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2015 Lafayette Leopards football team”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2015 Lafayette Leopards football team primary sources, 2015 Lafayette Leopards football team archive and Lafayette research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2015 Lafayette Leopards football team”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2015 Lafayette Leopards football team” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.