CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2015 Argentina Open – Doubles

2015 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 18, 2023
Entity authorityQ19358356 ↗
Source-derived summary

Marcel Granollers and Marc López were the defending champions, but they chose to compete in Acapulco instead.

Jarkko Nieminen and André Sá won the title, defeating Pablo Andújar and Oliver Marach in the final, 4–6, 6–4, [10–7].

Editorial summary

“2015 Argentina Open – Doubles” enters the record as 2015 tennis event results. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Argentina, Doubles and tennis can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current 37-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Argentina, Doubles and tennis.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“2015 Argentina Open – Doubles” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Argentina, Doubles and tennis provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 18, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q19358356. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2015 Argentina Open – Doubles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2015 Argentina Open – Doubles primary sources, 2015 Argentina Open – Doubles archive and Argentina research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2015 Argentina Open – Doubles”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2015 Argentina Open – Doubles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.